High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Application for want of prosecution as the applicant appeared in person and no counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Revn 34 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 34 OF 2001
Irappa Shidharayya Adole
...Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra
…Respondent
None for Applicant Mrs. Neeta S. Jain – APP for the State ******
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. MONDAY , 8TH JANUARY, 2018
P.C.
. None appears for the Applicant. Hence, this Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
1/1
V.A. Tikam
Irappa Shidharayya Adole
State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
