A single judge of the Bombay High Court rejected a petition filed by Barshi Nagar Parishad. The judge refused to entertain a review petition concerning the delay in a compassionate ground application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
907rpwst488-17
pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.488 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10347 OF 2015
Barshi Nagar Parishad. ...Petitioner Versus 1.Anil Ramesh Pawar & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Mandar Limaye, for the Petitioner.
Ms.Kavita N.Solunke, AGP for Respondent No.3.
Ms.Anu C.Kaladharan I/b. Mr.Neel G.Helekar, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 8th August,2018
P.C.:
already clarified that an application on compassionate ground is to be considered in accordance with law.
Prashant Vilas Rane
Digitally signed by Prashant Vilas Rane Date: 2018.08.14 19:25:21 +0530
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Review Petition should be entertained regarding the speedy consideration of a compassionate ground application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Barshi Nagar Parishad
Anil Ramesh Pawar
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
