The sole respondent in civil applications was found dead. Consequently, the High Court held that the proceedings against the respondent abated entirely.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3672 OF 2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3673 OF 2015 IN
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.31071 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders None Present. CORAM : V.R. KACHARE REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 19th July, 2018 As per Bailiff's remark dated 21/03/2018 sole Respondent is “Dead”. Hence, whole proceeding stands abated against sole Respondent. sd/Registrar (Judl.-II) dsm – R(J-II) – 19.07.18
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
