The Bench upheld the validity of directions to reduce 5th and 8th standards in Zilla Parishad Schools, noting that any prejudice could be challenged later. The PIL was disposed of.
Public Interest Litigation disposed of; no orders for costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1107pil90.18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 90/2018.
Sayed Jawwad Husain. - VERSUS-
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A. HAQ, JJ.
DATE : JULY 11, 2018.
Heard Shri R.D. Karode, learned Counsel
for the petitioner and Shri N.R. Patil, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 4.
Order
1107pil90.18
2
wrong with the directions issued by respondent no.3. Hence, Public Interest Litigation is disposed of. No
costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Sayed Jawwad Husain
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Z. A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
