The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur dismissed PIL No. 40 of 2018 without observing on merits, authorizing the petitioner to pursue his cause elsewhere. No order as to costs.
Petitioner granted liberty to pursue cause; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1107pil40.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 40 OF 2018
(Prof. Dr. Balchandra s/o Nattuji Khandekar vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & Z.A. HAQ, JJ. JULY 11, 2018.
Shri S.R. Narnaware, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri U. Aurangabadkar, learned ASGI for the respondents.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Prof. Dr. Balchandra s/o Nattuji Khandekar
Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
Z.A. HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
