Disposed

Deepak Kumar Pyarelal Gupta v. the Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Others

Bombay HC4 Apr 2018PIL/85/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL sought orders regarding the construction of an over-bridge. The Court noted the Respondent Municipal Corporation had issued a No Objection Certificate and directed all Respondents to undertake the construction forthwith without delay before disposing of the litigation.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondents to undertake construction of over-bridge and approach roads forthwith.

Deepak Kumar Pyarelal Gupta Vs the Jalgaon City… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

pil85.16

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.85 OF 2016

¶6

Deepak Kumar s/o Pyarelal Gupta,
Age-39 years, Occu:Social Work and
Private Service, R/o-388,
Ghakul, Shivajinagar,
Jalgaon, Dist-Jalgaon,
Pan Card No.AKZPG5106E,
Mob. No.9890809030

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

1) The Jalgaon City Municipal
 Corporation,
 Through: its Commissioner,
 having its office at
 Administrative Building,
 Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Bhavan,
 Nehru Chowk, Jalgaon, Dist-Jalgaon,

¶10

2) The Divisional Engineer (North),
 Bhusaval, Central Railway,
 having its office at Divisional
 Office, Engineering Branch,
 Bhusaval, Dist-Jalgaon,

¶11

3) Divisional Railway Manager, Bhusaval,

¶12

4) The Union of India, Through its Secretary, Railway Department, New Delhi,

¶13

pil85.16

¶14

¶15

5) The State of Maharashtra,
 Through:Secretary,
 Urban Development Department,
 Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,
6) The Superintendent of Police,
 Jalgaon, Dist-Jalgaon,
7) The Maharashtra State Road
 Transport Corporation (MSRTC),
 Jalgaon, Dist-Jalgaon,
8) Chief Executive Engineer /
 Superintending Engineer,
 Public Works Department,
 Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENTS

¶16

 ...
 Mr.K.C. Sant Advocate for Petitioner.
 Mr.P.R. Patil Advocate for Respondent
 No.1.
 Mr. D.V. Soman Advocate for Respondent
 Nos.2 and 3.
 Mr. S.B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for Respondent
 No.4.
 Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Additional Government
 Pleader for Respondent Nos.5, 6 and 8.
 ...

¶17

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
 DATE : 4TH APRIL, 2018

¶18

ORDER :

¶19

1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing

¶20

pil85.16

¶21

¶22

for Respondent No.1 - Jalgaon City Municipal
Corporation has tendered across the Bar a copy of
"No Objection Certificate" issued by the Municipal
Corporation, Jalgaon, dated 28th November, 2016,
for construction of the over-bridges. Learned
counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 Municipal
Corporation, on written instructions, submits that
for the proposed construction of over-bridge and
approach roads, the Respondent Corporation has
granted no objection in the year 2016 itself, and
therefore, the question of opposing the proposed
construction of the over-bridge and approach roads

¶23

at the behest of the Respondent Corporation would
not arise.

¶24

2.In that view of the matter, the

¶25

Respondents are directed to undertake the work of
construction of over-bridge and approach roads
forthwith, without any further delay.

¶26

3.With the above observations, the Public

¶27

pil85.16

¶28

¶29

Interest Litigation stands disposed of.

¶30

.The parties to act upon authenticated

¶31

copy of this order.

¶32

[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/APR18

Deepak Kumar Pyarelal Gupta v. the Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar Pyarelal Gupta v. the Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Riyaz Usman Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kiran Sukhdeo Dhepe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ranjeet S/O Dattatray Harne and Another Vs the State of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development and 1

Shri Rahul S/O Madhukar Deshmukh Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi and 2 Othe

Vaishali Deepak Bafna Vs State of Maharashtra, through School Education Dept and Ors.

Vikas Prakash Yedake Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Deepakkumar Pyarelal Gupta Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vaishali Karbhari Jadhav and Others Vs the Union of India and Others

Kavita Vijaykumar Kasture Vs Vijaykumar Sharanappa Kasture

Yogeshwari Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. Thr Chief Executive Officer Vs Mah. Electricity Regulatory Commissioner and Ors.

Riyaz Usman Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashok Bansilal Kotecha and Others Vs K R Rathanle and Another

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Shiva Trust Aurangabads through Its President

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Shiva Trust Aurangabads through Its President