The High Court of Bombay disposed of PIL No.236 of 2014 by holding that the public interest litigation had served its purpose and the petitioner's grievance no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)-PIL-236-14.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.236 OF 2014
Shri. Vijay Maruti Satape ..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
Mr. Manoj A. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ramesh D. Rane, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. Mr. Vivek Patil I/by Vivek Patil & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2018
P.C.
1] Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view
of the subsequent developments, the grievance of the Petitioner no more survives.
2] The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as having
served its purpose.
Balaji Govindrao Panchal
Digitally signed by Balaji Govindrao Panchal Date: 2018.10.12 10:51:19 +0530
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
BGP. 1 o f 1
Shri. Vijay Maruti Satape
State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
