Allowed

Vinod Amolakchand Gandhi v. Dilip Mansukhlal Gandhi and Others

Bombay HC26 Nov 2018PIL/130/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought withdrawal of a public interest litigation after respondent nos.6-8 were added and a related civil suit was instituted. The court allowed withdrawal of the PIL and directed refund of the security deposit.

What did the court decide?

PIL disposed as withdrawn with liberty to approach court later; security deposit of Rs. 2,00,000/- permitted to be withdrawn.

Vinod Amolakchand Gandhi Vs Dilip Mansukhlal… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

pil130.16

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.130 OF 2016

¶5

Vinod S/o Amolakchand Gandhi

¶6

..PETITIONER

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Dilip S/o Mansukhlal Gandhi & ors. ..RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr U.S. Malte, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S.A. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mr V.S. Bedre, Advocate for respondent no.2; Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar , A.G.P. for respondent Nos.3 & 5; Mr Avinash Phad, Advocate holding for Mr N.V. Gaware, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 to 8

¶10

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 26^th November, 2018

¶12

ORAL ORDER:

¶13

Heard Mr Malte, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner for some time. It is submitted before this Court that respondent nos.6 to 8 were added as parties to the public interest litigation by way of amendment. Respondent nos.6 to 8 are added as respondents on 24th November, 2017.

¶14

An affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of respondent nos.6 to 8 and it

¶15

is brought to the notice of this Court that prior to these persons being added

¶16

as party respondents to the present public interest litigation, a civil suit is

¶17

pil130.16

¶18

(2)

¶19

instituted at their instance in the Court of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmednagar on 20^th February, 2017. In view of the fact that respondent nos.6 to 8 have approached the competent Civil Court challenging the action of the Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar and now the competent Civil Court is in the process of deciding the civil rights of the parties, Mr Malte, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, prayed for withdrawal of the present public interest litigation with liberty to approach this Court in case if the petitioner has a grievance post the orders passed by the competent Civil Court. Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶20

The petitioner was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- in this Court within stipulated period to show his bona fides and the amount is deposited by the petitioner. As the petition is withdrawn by the petitioner, the learned Counsel prays for withdrawal of the amount of Rs.2,00,000/deposited by him in this Court. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited in this Court in compliance of the order of this Court dated 5^th October, 2016.

¶21

(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

¶22

amj

Vinod Amolakchand Gandhi v. Dilip Mansukhlal Gandhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Amolakchand Gandhi v. Dilip Mansukhlal Gandhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Sapan Shrivastava and Anr. Vs Collector Thane and Ors.

Shaikh Yasin Shaikh Gaffar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Primary Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Madhukar Muralidhar Nazare Vs State of Maharashtra through Gp and Anr.

Shri. Sachin Tanaji Jadhav Vs M/S. P.S.K. Infrastructure and Projects Ltd. and Ors.

Santosh Vitthal Purhe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sagar Navnath Tanpure and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anil Sitaram Kshirsagar Vs the Secretary / Dy. Secretary Adiwasi Vikas Dept. and Ors.

Mr. Pravin Laxman Mhapralkar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Collector and Ors.

Pravin Pandurang Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shivshankar Omprakash Rachatte Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mahatma Phule Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha through Its President and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sopan Ranju Khandare and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Vandana Krushna and Others

Samta Sevabhavi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Vice President and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

B G Nirwal the Secretary Sanjivani Education Society Vs Abasaheb Eknath Solanke and Others