Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn based on counsel's request. Liberty to file a fresh petition granted with conditions regarding the declaration of specific factual repudiation by the respondent in the new filing.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition granted with conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 901 wp 1385.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 1385 OF 2017
PRAVIN PANDURANG PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Venjane Tukaram M. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. U.B. Bondar for R/2 & 3.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 24.11.2018
P.C. :-
The learned counsel on instructions pray for withdrawal of the petition. At the request of the counsel petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of.
and an approval was granted to the petitioner. In the reply filed by the
( 2 ) 901 wp 1385.17
respondent-Zilla Parishad, it was specifically stated that there is no such record available in the office of the Education Officer that an approval is granted to the petitioner and it was the specific stand of the respondent-Zilla Parishad that reliance is placed on a document which is not a true or genuine document. With this statement, if the petition is filed then and then only the office to accept such a petition being filed subsequently by the petitioner.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.]
mub
PRAVIN PANDURANG PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
