In PIL No.102 of 2016, the Court ordered the State of Maharashtra to immediately implement Section 2(d) of the RTE Act, 2009 during the pendency of rule amendments regarding disadvantaged groups.
State directed to implement Section 2(d) of RTE Act, 2009 immediately pending rule amendments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
5-pil 102-16
psv
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.102 OF 2016
Rajeshwar Ganesh Panchal ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary & Anr. ...Respondents -----
Mr.R.G. Panchal, Petitioner in person. Mr.A.B. Vagyani, G.P., with Mr.More, AAGP, for State. Mr.A.D. Yadav for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 24th APRIL 2018
P.C.:
The learned Government Pleader Mr.Vagyani, on instructions, submits that necessary amendment would be carried out in the rules namely Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules 2011 and 2013 in tune with definition of terms, “Children belonging to disadvantaged group” as envisaged under Section 2(d) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
2
5-pil 102-16
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State must implement the definition under Section 2(d) of the RTE Act, 2009 immediately even while rules are pending amendment?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeshwar Ganesh Panchal
The State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary & Anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
