The High Court dismissed an appeal against the rejection of interim relief in a specific performance suit. The court held the impugned order was correct, leaving the merits of the suit open for adjudication by the Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
911appl369-17
pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 369 OF 2017 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 727 OF 2017
Sangeeta Ajithan ...Appellant Versus Neptune Ventures And Developers Private Limited And Others ...Respondents ---
Mr.Sachin Daga with Ms.Hemali Bhatia, for the Appellant.
Mr.Akshay Patil i/b. Mayur Thorat, for the Respondents.
---- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 20th APRIL 2018
P.C.:
2
911appl369-17
pvr
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]
[NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting interim relief in a specific performance suit requires interference by the High Court.
Sangeeta Ajithan
Neptune Ventures And Developers Private Limited And Others
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
