A notice of motion seeking condonation of delay to set aside an order rejecting a writ petition was dismissed. The court found the delay unjustified due to the casual nature of the supporting affidavit and complete negligence by the department officers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
150-11-NMW-1=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 150 OF 2011 IN
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 368 OF 2009
The Commissioner Central Excise Thane-1
.. Applicant / orig. Petitioner
v/s.
SRS Polytex and Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. J.B. Mishra for the applicant / orig. petitioner Ms. Aarti Sawer I/b V.M. Doiphode & Co. for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J. DATED : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C.
Digitally signed by Uday Uday Shivaji Jagtap Shivaji Date: 2018.09.11 Jagtap 19:18:21 +0530
1 of 2
150-11-NMW-1=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
application.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing a motion to set aside an order rejecting a writ petition for non-removal of office objections should be condoned.
Whether an affidavit offered explanation for the delay in utilizing judicial time.
The Commissioner Central Excise Thane-1
SRS Polytex and Anr.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
