Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal under a Central Board circular regarding tax effect thresholds. High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and ordered refund of court fees.
Court fees refunded as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-CEXA-85-18.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 85 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST & Central …Appellant Excise
Versus
Suraj Air Flow Engineers …Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, a/w Mr. J.B. Mishra, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 5 September 2018
SharayuPandurangKhot
Digitally signedby SharayuPandurang KhotDate:2018.09.1011:28:14 +1200
ORDER :
1944 challenges the order dated 22nd September 2017 passed
by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
September 5, 2018
902-CEXA-85-18.doc
dated 11th July 2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs directing the Revenue not to file Appeals to the High Court where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs. It also directs its Officers to withdraw the pending Appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2 September 5, 2018
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
Suraj Air Flow Engineers
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
