Single-line order where the high court granted a Notice of Motion to restore Suit (L) No. 434 of 2017, condoned delay, and directed removal of office objections within three weeks to prevent dismissal.
Notice of Motion granted; Suit restored; condonation of delay allowed; three weeks given to remove objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41-NMS480-18.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 480 OF 2018
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 434 OF 2017
Harish Ramji Singh & Radhadevi Ramji Singh
Versus
Sunil Ramji Singh
…Plaintiffs
…Defendant
Ms Seema Hunnurkar, for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:11th July 2018
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support of the
Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion is made absolute, delay
being condoned. Suit (L) No. 434 of 2017 is restored.
2.All office objections to be removed within three weeks from
today, failing which the Suit shall stand dismissed without further
reference to the Court and will not be restored thereafter under any
circumstances.
3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of. No costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 1 of 1
11th July 2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant a Notice of Motion for restoration of a suit with condonation of delay.
Whether to direct removal of office objections to avoid dismissal of the suit.
Harish Ramji Singh & Radhadevi Ramji Singh
Sunil Ramji Singh
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court