Sunil Pandurang Chavan v. Kashiram Pandurang Chavan (Deceased) and Pandurang Vishram Chavan (Applicant)
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court ordered an amendment in testamentary petition proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-CST82-18.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 82 OF 2018
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 444 OF 2017
Pandurang Vishram Chavan…Applicant
In the matter between
Sunil Pandurang Chavan...Petitioner
And
Kashiram Pandurang Chavan…Deceased
Mr Hemant Ghadigaonkar , for the Applicant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 11th July 2018
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support of the
Chamber Summons, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two
weeks from today.
2. The Chamber Summons is disposed of in these terms. No costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 1 of 1
11th July 2018
Pandurang Vishram Chavan
Sunil Pandurang Chavan
Kashiram Pandurang Chavan
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court