The High Court dismissed the party's plea for condonation of delay and dismissed the notice of motion as the respondents had no objection to the delay in filing the appeal by the Commissioner.
Notice of Motion allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-NMA-628-18.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 628 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 120 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST and Central …Applicant/ Excise Appellant
Versus
M/s. Lupin Ltd. & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Karan Adik, i/by Pooja Thorat, for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms. Mansi Patil, for the Respondents.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 12 October 2018
ORDER :
1 / 2
October 12, 2018
11-NMA-628-18.doc
381 days delay in filing the Appeal from the impugned Order dated 16th November 2016 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
prayer clause (a).
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2 October 12, 2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 381 days in filing the appeal should be condoned since the respondents have no objection.
The Commissioner of CGST and Central
M/s. Lupin Ltd. & Ors.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
