Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad v. the Commissioner of Central Excise,Pune-Iii
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that an appeal under Section 35(G)(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging a Tribunal order on a pure question of rate of duty, was not maintainable. The Court dismissed the appeal as such matters are to be approached before the Apex Court under Section 35(L)(1)(b).
What did the court decide?
The appeal filed under Section 35(G)(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed as not maintainable.