The High Court allowed the Notice of Motion to condone an 8-day delay in filing an appeal by Ritex Overseas against an Empty Canteen order, citing lack of objection from the respondent.
Notice of Motion allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for condonation of 8 days delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-NMA-516-2018.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasureDate: 2018.10.0115:00:18 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 516 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 108 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise … Applicant / Ori. Appellant
V/s.
Ritex Overseas …Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, with Mr. J.B. Mishra, for the Applicant / Orig. Appellant.
Mr. Kunal Choudhari, for the Respondent.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE: 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PC:-
delay of 8 days in filing an Appeal from the Order dated 6th September, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal).
the Respondent has no objection at the delay being condoned.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an 8-day delay in filing the Appeal under Central Excise Appeal (L) Rules should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
Ritex Overseas
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court