The Bombay High Court dispensed with a notice of motion in an appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal based on the affidavit.
Condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nmal545-18.doc
pvr 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODG) NO.545 OF 2018 IN
APPEAL (LODG) NO.239 OF 2018
Aarti Pandey Ahir. ...Applicant/Appellant Versus Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents ----
Mr.V.R.Patil, for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Karan Bhosale, Mr.D.J.Kakalia and Mr.Paresh Patkar i/b. Mull & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for Respondent No.1.
Mr.R.Y.Sirsikar & Sandeep Patil, for Respondent No.2-BMC
CORAM: NARESH H.PATIL AND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ DATED: 11th June, 2018 ---
P.C.:
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Aarti Pandey Ahir
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd
NARESH H.PATIL
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
