Dismissed
Mr. Gary Sewell v. Mrs. Desiree Sewell
Bombay HCLPA/118/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
lpa 118.13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12 lpa 118.13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 118 OF 2013
IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 131 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6130 OF 2012
Mr. Gary Sewell ... Appellant V/s. Mrs. Desiree Sewell ... Respondent
None for the parties.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
th June, 2018.
P.C.
None for the parties. Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
2/2 12 lpa 118.13.sxw
Mr. Gary Sewell
Mrs. Desiree Sewell
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court