The Bombay High Court allowed the Income Tax Appeal No. 14 of 2017 to be withdrawn at the instance of the appellant's counsel, disposing of the matter accordingly without substantive adjudication.
The appeal was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.17ita etc
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.14 OF 2017
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nashik
..APPELLANT
VERSUS
Shri Sureshkumar Bhikamchand Jain (HUF), Jalgaon
..RESPONDENT
Mr Alok Sharma, Advocate for appellant
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATE : 6th September, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
Mr Sharma, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
(MANISH PITALE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nashik
Shri Sureshkumar Bhikamchand Jain (HUF), Jalgaon
PRASANNA B. VARALE
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
