Allowed

The State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Krishna Jadhav

Bombay HC22 Apr 2018FA/872/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Lok Adalat group disposal of numerous First Appeals. All parties submitted consent terms. The court accepted consent terms and disposed of all appeals accordingly, allowing refund of court fees and dismissing pending applications.

What did the court decide?

All appeals disposed of in terms of consent terms; appellants entitled to refund of court fees; pending applications disposed of.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Tukaram Krishna… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

DSS

¶2

2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

First Appeal NO. 862 OF 2002

¶7

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shantabai D. Kalange ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 841 OF 2002

¶8

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Uttam Narayan Kumbhar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 844 OF 2002

¶9

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Hariba Krishna Kumbhar ...Respondent(s)

¶10

WITH First Appeal NO. 847 OF 2002

¶11

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Dhananjay Tanaji Gaikwad ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 850 OF 2002

¶12

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bhanudas Ramchandra Gaikwad ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 852 OF 2002

¶13

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Gorakh Baburao Zakane ...Respondent(s)

¶14

1/12

¶15

DSS

¶16

2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶17

WITH First Appeal NO. 854 OF 2002

¶18

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Rakhamabai Shankar Shinde ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 855 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shantabai Lalasaheb Kale ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 856 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Sharad Anantrao Kumbhar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 859 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Ananta Gulab Kumbhar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 861 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shantabai Keshav Sawant ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 863 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Jagannath Rau Kalange ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 864 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Pandurang Kondiba Kumbhar ...Respondent(s)

¶19

2/12

¶20

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶21

WITH First Appeal NO. 865 OF 2002

¶22

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Eknath Nana Jadhav ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 866 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Uttam Dada Kale ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 868 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Suresh Babasaheb Kalange ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 869 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Kamalabai Uttamrao Kale ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 870 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Kailas Anantrao Kumbhar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 872 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant versus Tukaram K. Jadhav ..Respondents AND First Appeal No. 871 of 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant versus Jijabai P. Kumbhar ..Respondents

¶23

3/12

¶24

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶25

AND First Appeal No. 2301 of 2005 Srirang Jyothi Rupanwar and ors. ..Appellant(s) versus The Land Acquisition Officer No.3 Pune and ors.

¶26

AND First Appeal NO. 235	..Respondents OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus	...Petitioner(s)
Dattatraya Shripati Jadhav (since Deceased)through His Legal Heirs Rajendra Dattatraya Jadhav And Ors WITH First Appeal NO. 236	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus	...Petitioner(s)
Popat Mahadeo Jadhav And Anr. WITH First Appeal NO. 237	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus	...Petitioner(s)
Pralhad Hariba Borate And Anr.	...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 238	OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus	...Petitioner(s)
Pushpa Babanrao Kale AND First Appeal NO. 626	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus	...Petitioner(s)
Lahu Udhav Kangude	...Respondent(s)

¶27

4/12

¶28

DSS

¶29

2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶30

WITH First Appeal NO. 627 OF 2006

¶31

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Vilas Udhav Kangude ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 628 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Vilas Udhav Kangude & Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 629 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Kashinath B. Markad And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 630 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mahadev Tulshiram Mane & Anr. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 631 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bala Bandu Khandekar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 638 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bapu Shivdas Dadas (decd) By Lrs. & Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 639 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shakuntalabai Nanasaheb Holkar ...Respondent(s)

¶32

5/12

¶33

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶34

First Appeal	WITH NO. 640	OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Ramchandra Dadas First Appeal	AND NO. 3069	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Eknath Shivram Shelar And Anr First Appeal	. WITH NO. 2411	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Kisan Pandurang Kale First Appeal	WITH NO. 2412	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Vithal Santu Shelar And Ors. First Appeal	WITH NO. 2789	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Nivrutti Balwant Bansode First Appeal	WITH NO. 2790	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus		...Petitioner(s)
Dilip Shankar Nagare And Ors. First Appeal	WITH NO. 2791	...Respondent(s) OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra Versus Haribhau Shankar Rokade And	Anr.	...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s)

¶35

6/12

¶36

DSS

¶37

2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶38

WITH First Appeal NO. 2792 OF 2006

¶39

The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Dadu Shankar Kuchekar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2793 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Narayan Ramchandra Bande ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2794 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shri. Sakharam Dagadu Bande (deceased) By Legal Heirs Throgh 1) Shri. Baba Sakharam Bande ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2795 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Sopan Harichandra Shelar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2796 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mahadu Dhondi Wagajkar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2833 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Keru Gana Shelar And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2834 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Malanbai Ramchandra Bankar ...Respondent(s)

¶40

7/12

¶41

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶42

WITH First Appeal NO. 2835 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mahadu Tulshiram Bande ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2864 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Jagganath Pandurang Bhong And Anr. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2865 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Suresh Vishvanath Shelar And Anr. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2882 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Samba Shripati Bande ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2883 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shri.Bhagwan Dhondi Inje (deceased) Through Legal Heirs 1) Shri. Namdeo Bhagwan Inje And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2884 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shri. Govind Gopal Shelar (deceased) Through Lrs. Smt. Chandrabhaga Govind Shelar And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2885 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Jayashri Jagnnath Bande And Anr. ...Respondent(s)

¶43

8/12

¶44

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶45

WITH First Appeal NO. 2887 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Laxman Shankar Kale And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 3032 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Hanmant Laxman Bansode ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 3070 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Adinath Dagadu Shelar And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 3071 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Kondiba Tukaram Shelar (deceased) Through By Legal Heirs. 1-a) Shri. Devidas Kandiba Shelar And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 3072 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mahadeo Shankar Shelar ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal NO. 806 OF 2007 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bhaskar M. Kangude & ors. ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal NO. 270 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bhagwan B. Padule ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal NO. 421 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Vithal T. Mane and anr. ...Respondent(s)

¶46

9/12

¶47

DSS

¶48

2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶49

AND

¶50

First Appeal NO. 462 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Rakhamaji J. Gopale (Decd) through L.Rs. ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal NO. 288 OF 2011 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Pandhrinath Genu Mane (Decd) by L.Rs. ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal (St) NO. 22936 OF 2005 The State Of Maharashtra and anr. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Kailas D. Tonde and anr. ...Respondent(s) AND First Appeal (St) NO. 11313 OF 2015 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus Shankar R. Kudekar and ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶51

WITH

¶52

First Appeal (St.) NO. 11290 OF 2015 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶53

Sudam L. Shingote and ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶54

AND

¶55

First Appeal NO. 403 OF 2017

¶56

The State Of Maharashtra and anr. ...Petitioner(s)

¶57

Versus

¶58

Magnath K. Jadhav (since deceased through L.Rs.) ...Respondent(s)

¶59

WITH

¶60

CONNECTED CIVIL APPLICATIONS IN RESPECTIVE MATTERS

¶61

APPEARANCE:

¶62

Mr. Y.Y. Dabke – AGP for the Appellant – State in all the matters and for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in FAST 11313/15.

¶63

10/12

¶64

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶65

Mr. Gaurav Potnis i/b Ms P.H. Potnis for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in FA 871/2002, FAST 11313/15, for Respondent No.1 in FA 288/2011, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in FA 462/2009 and connected matters and for the Respondents in remaining matters and for the Petitioners in FA 2301/2005.

¶66

CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. (HEAD OF THE PANEL)

¶67

: S.M. KOCHEY , REGISTRAR (FINANCE & BUDGET) & I/c. REGISTRAR (PROTOCOL)

¶68

: M.S. LONE, MEMBER SECRETARY STATE COURT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMMITTEE

¶69

DATE : 22^nd APRIL, 2018.

¶70

P.C. :-

¶71

1] Heard learned counsel for the parties in all the aforesaid matters.

¶72

2] Learned counsel for the parties hand in consent terms, in each case, which are duly signed by the parties and their advocates. The consent terms, in each case, are taken on record and marked as “X” for purposes of identification.

¶73

3] The appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The appellant (s), in each case, shall be entitled to refund of court fees in terms of the Rules as permissible.

¶74

4] Although, in the consent terms, it is stated that these appeals are to be listed in the Next Lok Adalat for purpose of reporting compliance, in our opinion, this is not necessary. In case,

¶75

11/12

¶76

DSS 2-FA-862-02 - Group matters

¶77

there is any difficulty with regard to compliance, the parties are at liberty to mention the matters or take out such proceedings as are permissible under the law.

¶78

5] All the aforesaid appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶79

6] The pending civil applications, if any, do not survive and the same are also disposed of.

¶80

(M.S. SONAK,J.) HEAD OF THE PANEL

¶81

(S.M. KOCHEY) MEMBER

¶82

(M.S. LONE) MEMBER

¶83

12/12

The State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Krishna Jadhav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Krishna Jadhav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Shabbir Badshah Tamboli Vs Smt. Narmada Jayram Pardeshi (Teli) and Ors.

Smt. Shevantabai Gundappa Kamble and Ors. Vs Shri. Rangrao Shripati Aabdar and Ors.

Dyanu Mhadu Patil and Anr. Vs Sonappa Pandhurang Shisal

The State of Maharashtra Vs Damu Ganpat Wadhane

The State of Maharashtra Vs Shri Ramchandra Yadavrao Parekar

The State of Maharashtra Vs Jijabai Pandurang Kumbhar