National Lok Adalat heard multiple First Appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings and others. Counsel filed consent terms. The court disposed of all appeals based on the consent terms.
Appeals disposed of in terms of consent terms submitted by parties; pending civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
First Appeal NO. 863 OF 2013
State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Rakhmaji Babu Yede ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 864 OF 2013 State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Narayan Nana Yede ...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 333 OF 2006
Krishna Govind Wayal D/h Parvati Krishna Wayal And Ors.
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
The Land Acquisition Officer No.03, Pune And Ors.
...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 334 OF 2006
Ankush Dattu Gawade And Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus
The Land Acquisition Officer No.03, Pune And Ors.
...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 1025 OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus
Suman Mahadeo Yadav And Ors. ...Respondent(s)
1/6
DSS
PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
WITH First Appeal NO. 239 OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Pandurang Ganpat Waiwhare And Anr. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2357 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Rajkumar Nivrutti Shinde And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2358 OF 2008
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Ramchandra Sadashiv Shinde And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH
First Appeal NO. 240 OF 2006
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Sambha Namdeo Kale ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 898 OF 2016
Mr. Janardan Narayan Bhosale And Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mr. Ramesh Dhondiram Ghorpade-Patil And Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 842 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Nivrutti Rama Kalange ...Respondent(s)
2/6
DSS
PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
WITH First Appeal NO. 843 OF 2002
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Tukaram Dada Kale ...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 846 OF 2002
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Dnyandeo Maruti Pawar ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 848 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Babu Dada Kale ...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 849 OF 2002
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Gurudas Nivrutti Kale ...Respondent(s)
WITH First Appeal NO. 853 OF 2002
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Bhagubai Shankar Kale ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 857 OF 2002
The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bala Dada Kale ...Respondent(s)
3/6
DSS PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
WITH First Appeal NO. 858 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Namdeo Krishna Jadhav ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 860 OF 2002 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Tanaji Jagannath Suryawanshi ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 2880 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Bhikudas Shankar Jadhav ...Respondent(s) WITH First Appeal NO. 250 OF 2003 The State Of Maharashtra ...Petitioner(s) Versus Damu Ganpat Wadhane ...Respondent(s)
Appearance in all matters
Mr. Y.Y. Dabke, AGP for the Appellant(s) – State. None for the Appellant (s) in FA 898 of 2016.
Mr. Gaurav Potnis i/b Ms Pallavi Potnis for the Respondent in all the matters and for the Appellant (s) in FA No. 334 of 2006.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. (HEAD OF THE PANEL)
DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2018.
4/6
DSS
PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
P.C. :-
1] These matters are not on board. However, at the request of learned counsel for the parties, they are taken on board.
2] Heard learned counsel for the parties in all the aforesaid
matters.
3] Learned counsel for the parties hand in consent terms, in each case, which are duly signed by the parties and their advocates. The consent terms, in each case, are taken on record and marked as “X” for purposes of identification.
4] The appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The appellant shall be entitled to refund of court fees in terms of the Rules as permissible.
5] Although, in the consent terms, it is stated that these appeals are to be listed in the Next Lok Adalat for purpose of reporting compliance, in our opinion, this is not necessary. In case, there is any difficulty with regard to compliance, the parties are at
5/6
DSS
PROD-21-GRUP -FA-863-13
liberty to mention the matters or take out such proceedings as are
permissible under the law.
terms.
7] The pending civil applications, if any, do not survive and
the same are also disposed of.
(M.S. SONAK,J.) HEAD OF THE PANEL
(S.M. KOCHEY) MEMBER
(M.S. LONE) MEMBER
6/6
State Of Maharashtra
Rakhmaji Babu Yede
Narayan Nana Yede
Krishna Govind Wayal
The Land Acquisition Officer No.03, Pune
Ankush Dattu Gawade
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
