into existence in the year 1995, moved the change reports. He further submitted that in the case of Change Report No.64 of 1996 of the substitution or replacement of the two trustees, the earlier trustees who were replaced and who had submitted the resignation had no objection for the said replacement and, therefore, the change report was accepted. He submitted that photocopies of four orders passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner (i) dated 11th July 2017 thereby accepting enquiry applications/ change report Nos. 556 of 2001 in respect of election of the trustees and Executive Council along with office bearers of the trust for the period from 2001 to 2006; (ii) dated 11th July 2017 accepting change report 513 of 2006 for the period 2006 to 2011 (iii) dated 11th July 2017 accepting change report No.248 of 2011 from 2011 to 2016 and (iv) dated 11th July 2017 accepting change report No.824 of 2016 for the period 2016 to 2021. By these reports further elections of members of Trust and Managing Committee, office bearers were accepted post dated. On a query, I am informed that these orders dated 11th July 2017 passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner Sangli are not challenged before the Joint Charity Commissioner by the present appellant. Thus, it appears that from 1996 onwards, nearly for about 20 years the trust is run by the two office bearers of the
