Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited v. Mrs.Pramila Ramesh Urade @ Uradya and Ors.
Bombay HCFA/484/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Registrar noted receipt of office notes and directed three weeks time for removing office objection.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.4631 OF 2018
¶4
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| None Present. | |
| CORAM : V.R. KACHARE REGISTRAR (JUDL–II) |
|
| Date : 22ndJune, 2018 | |
| 3 weeks time is granted to remove | |
| office objection. | |
| sd/ Registrar (Judl.II) |
|
| dsm – R(JII) – 22.06.18 |
Coram
AI extract
V.R. Kachare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri Prabhakar Dasharath Lohakare vs Smt. Surekha Ankush Dhaigude
Smt. Parvati Shankar Jadhav and Anr. vs Shri. Vasim Kutubuddin Shaikh and Anr.
Smt. Parvati Shankar Jadhav and Anr. vs Shri. Vasim Kutubuddin Shaikh and Anr.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited, Mumbai Thr. Its Divisional Controller vs Smt. Ashwini Prakash Birnale and Ors.