the Reference Court of the acquired land, it is quite evident that while determining the market value on the basis of the sale instances pertaining to small pieces of land, the market value has been proportionately brought down and decreased having regard to the fact that the acquired land is a big chunk of land. The learned Counsel submitted that in fact, when the claimant had claimed compensation @ Rs.2,000/- per sq.mtr. and the sale instances, which were brought on record by the claimant, were sufÏciently demonstrating that the market value of the acquired land was at the relevant time around Rs.2,000/- per sq.mtr, the Reference Court must have determined the market value of the acquired land @ Rs.2,000/- per sq.mtr. or around the said rate. The learned Counsel submitted that injustice has been caused to the claimant by determining the market value of the acquired land @ Rs.733/- per sq.mtr. The learned Counsel submitted that though, the Reference Court has relied upon the sale instance of a plot out of Gut No.240/1-A, has failed in considering that the said transaction had taken place prior to about three years of issuance of Section 4 Notification towards the acquisition of the said land. As such according to the learned Counsel, the rate which could have been received for the acquired land would have been much more than determined by the Reference Court. The learned Counsel in the circumstances prayed for enhancement in
