learned counsel that if the petitioner was having any grievance against the respondent No.5 which would fall under the scope of a criminal act and as such would lead to treat the act as an offence, in that case, whether the petitioner had availed any remedy which is available to him to approach the appropriate and competent forum including approaching the police authorities, the learned counsel Mr. Bayas, on instructions, fairly submits that, the petitioner had not availed such a remedy till date. Then it was submitted by Mr. Bayas, the learned counsel that the respondent No.5 is a licence holder, who acts in contravention of the conditions of licence. Again we put a query to the learned counsel that if this is the grievance of the petitioner, whether the petitioner had approached the competent authority who issues a certificate to a person for carrying out an activity as a money lender, and if it is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent no.5 is acting in contravention of the conditions of licence, whether such a grievance is raised to the licencing authority, Mr. Bayas, on instructions, submitted before us that such a course is not adopted by the petitioner.
