In PIL regarding grievances, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad found that authorities had initiated steps to redress issues. The court allowed the civil application for amendment to record these events.
Civil application for amendment allowed; amendment to be carried out within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7678.18ca
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7678 OF 2018 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.73 OF 2017
Vijay s/o Ramrao Patait,
Age: 50 years, Occ: Service,
R/o. Village Wida, Tq. Kaij,
District Beed & ors.
..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors
..RESPONDENTS
Mr N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for applicants;
Mr A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
MANISH PITALE,JJ.
DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2018
ORAL ORDER :
Heard Mr. Jadhav, learned Counsel
appearing for the applicants.
2.It is submitted that subsequent to filing
of the petition, certain events occurred. The
documents placed on record shows sequence of
events. The documents placed on record shows that
7678.18ca
(2)
on 14th September, 2017 itself, Block Development
Officer forwarded communication to the Gramsevak.
On 20th September, 2017 Deputy Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed also directed the
Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kaij.
3.The document placed at Exhibit-Z dated
18th November, 2017 shows that Assistant Block
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti forwarded
inquiry report through Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Beed and Chief Executive Officer
Beed by his communication dated 21st December, 2017
directed the Block Development Officer to submit
the report on seven points referred to in the
communication. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla
Parishad, Beed directed the Block Development
Officer to submit his report within five days,
meaning thereby, Chief Executive Officer wanted
feed back report from his subordinate officer
namely Block Development Officer as early as
possible.
4.Considering this fact, we are of the
7678.18ca
(3)
opinion that major part of the grievance raised by
the petitioners is addressed by the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed and Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed seems to be taking
positive steps so as to redress the grievance of
the petitioners. Accordingly, civil application for
amendment is allowed.
5.Necessary amendment be carried out within
one week from today.
6.Postthepetitionforfurther
consideration on 22nd October, 2018.
7.Learned Counsel appearing for the Zilla
Parishad to file affidavit in reply to the petition
and affidavit in reply state about the factual
aspects referred to in the Civil Application No.
7678 of 2018.
(MANISH PITALE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Tupe
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Application for amendment should be allowed given that the grievance was addressed by the authorities.
Vijay s/o Ramrao Patait & ors.
The State of Maharashtra & ors
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court