The court held that the contempt petition could not survive because the order allegedly disobeyed was recalled by the court itself, which also withdrew protection over the petitioner's education.
Contempt petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP85-18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 85/2018 IN W.P. NO. 7027/2017 (P)
(NAHUSH SANJIO DODKE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 19, 2018.
The contempt petition would not survive as the order of which the contempt is alleged is recalled by this Court and protection granted to the petitioner's education is withdrawn in view of the said order of recall.
Hence, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Nahush Sanjio Dodke
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A Naik
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
