A contempt petition regarding compliance with a direction to decide an appeal within three weeks was disposed of following a statement by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the direction had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
44cp84.18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
C.P. No.84 of 2018 in W.P. No.8168 of 2017 (D) (Rajni Sureshrao Kosurkar and another .vs. Dadaji Dagdu Bhuse, Mumbai)
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATE : 4.4.2018.
Mr.S.M.Ghodeswar, learned A.G.P. for respondent/State makes a statement that the direction which was issued by this Court to decide the appeal within three weeks is already complied with.
In view of the statement so made by the learned A.G.P., the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
jaiswal
Rajni Suresh Rao Kosurkar and another
Dadaji Dagdu Bhuse, Mumbai
B. R. Gavai
M. G. Giratkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
