Contempt petition disposed of without addressing merits pending a civil court injunction. Bench found no merit to entertain the contempt proceeding at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
44cp233.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
C.P.No.233 of 2017 in P.I.L. No.184 of 2016 (D) (Smt. Meerabai Durgadasji Agrawal and another .vs. Shri Ajay Kurwade, the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Deulgaonraja and another)
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Mr.B.G.Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.N.B.Kalwaghe, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.P.Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.K.S.Narwade, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 24.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATE : 4.4.2018.
Heard.
In view of subsequent development i.e. passing of status-quo order and the order of injunction by the Competent Civil Court, we do not find any merit to entertain the present Contempt Petition at this stage. Hence, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
jaiswal
Smt. Meerabai Durgadasji Agrawal
Shri Ajay Kurwade
B.R. Gavai
M.G. Giratkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
