The petitioner filed a company petition against the respondent. After entering into consent terms where both parties stated they had no remaining claims against each other, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.cp670.16.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.670 OF 2016
Lakhsmi Ganpathy Films Private Limited )….Petitioner V/s. Kinesis Films Private Limited )....Respondent
Mr.Rohan Sawant a/w Ms.Poonam Teddu I/by Mahesh Mahadgut for petitioner.
[Mr.Abhay Sharma-Director of petitioner present]. Mr.Krunal Mehta I/by Naik Naik and Co. for respondent. [Mr.Samir Gupta-Director of Respondent present in court].
---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 12.10.2018
P.C.:-
The consent terms signed by the director of petitioner, director of respondent and their respective Advocates is taken on record and marked `X' for identification. Directors are present in court and have been identified by their respective counsel.
KJ
903.cp670.16.doc
2/2
parties have settled the matter even the respondent has no claim whatsoever with respect to the subject transaction against petitioner.
Digitally signed by Jahagirdar Jahagirdar Kiran Ganesh Kiran Date: 2018.10.12 (K.R.SHRIRAM,J) Ganesh 07:36:26 +0530
KJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the company petition stands dismissed as withdrawn upon filing of consent terms showing no claim by either party.
Lakhsmi Ganpathy Films Private Limited
Kinesis Films Private Limited
K.R.SHIRRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
