This order records compliance with an earlier direction for payment of rental compensation. The acquiring body submitted that the cheque is ready, which was accepted. The proceeding is disposed of as nothing survives.
Proceeding disposed of on acceptance of submission that cheque for rental compensation is available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP 50 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
926 CONT. PETITION NO. 50 OF 2018 IN WP/7172/2013
SHAIKH SALIMUDDIN SHAIKH YUSUFODDIN KHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Shri. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent - State.
Shri. V.C. Patil, Advocate, holding for Shri. U.B. Bondar, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Coram: T.V. NALAWADE &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Date: 19 APRIL 2018
ORDER:
2 CP 50 of 2018
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)
rsl
ShaiKH SALIMUDDIN SHAIKH YUSUFODDIN KHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
