Petitioners sought training graduate teachers pay scale. Respondent agency undertook to decide proposals within three weeks, satisfying the court. Writ and contempt petitions were disposed of without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 6814.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6814 OF 2011
Sunil Rangnath Balvante and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Abhijit G. Choudhari, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri K. N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Girish K. Thigale (Naik), Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 499 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6814 OF 2011
Sunil Rangnath Balvante and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Abhijit G. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Shri D. J. Choudhari, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri K. N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Girish K. Thigale (Naik), Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 13TH AUGUST, 2018.
FINAL ORDER :
. It is submitted that, grievance of the petitioner No. 1 does
2 WP 6814.11
not subsist.
3 WP 6814.11
[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Aug. 18
Digitally signed by Bhalchandra Bhalchandra Sudhakar Sudhakar Bodke Bodke Date: 2018.08.16 11:58:39 +0530
Sunil Rangnath Balvante and others
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
