Contempt petitions are disposed of without exercising contempt jurisdiction as petitioners have statutory remedies under the M.E.P.S. Act, 1977.
Petitions disposed of; no contempt jurisdiction exercised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.495 OF 2018
(Syeda Amera Bano Vs. Mrs.Fatma Zakaria and others) IN APPEAL NO.17 OF 2017
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.496 OF 2018
(Shaikh Meraj Basheer Vs. Mrs.Fatma Zakaria and others) IN APPEAL NO.18 OF 2017
Mr.V.V.Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners.
( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)
DATE : 11/07/2018
PER COURT :
khs/JULY 2018/495-d
2
( Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)
khs/JULY 2018/495-d
Syeda Amera Bano and Shaikh Meraj Basheer
Mrs. Fatma Zakaria and others
Ravindra V Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
