High Court dismissed a Contempt Petition noting that the petitioner's caste claim was already decided. The bench deemed any delay non-deliberate and disposed of the petition without orders on costs.
Petition dismissed; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
0307cp49.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4754 OF 2014
(Bhojraj s/o Ramesh Dandekar vs. D.B. Tikle, Member/ Senior Research Officer of Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claim, Gadchiroli thr. its Chairman & Anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & Z.A. HAQ, JJ. JULY 03, 2018.
Heard Shri R.D. Murkute, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, states that the caste claim of the petitioner is already decided.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Contempt Petition should be allowed in absence of specific contumacious conduct.
Bhojraj s/o Ramesh Dandekar
D.B. Tikle
B.P. Dharadhikari
Z.A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
