Single-paragraph order disposing of a contempt petition. The court found no compliance issues or malice and disposed of the matter without costs.
Contempt petition disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp17.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 17/2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1390/2016 (D)
Shri Radheshyam Godulala Bareti
..VS..
Shri Nandkumar & ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri N.S. Bhelkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Shri A. Shukla, Adv h/f Shri R.L. Khapre, Adv for the respondent no. 3 Shri D.P. Thakare, Addl. GP for the respondent nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
Z.A.HAQ, JJ. DATED : 02/07/2018
As the order is complied with and we do not see malice, contempt petition is disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Ansari
Shri Radheshyam Godulala Bareti
Shri Nandkumar
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
Z.A.HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
