The petitioner, having received due pensionary benefits and stating no remaining grievance, withdrew his contempt petition arising from a writ petition concerning pension discrepancy.
Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1} 922CP345-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 345 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7954 OF 2014
Randhir s/o Dinkarrao Deshmukh ...Petitioner
Versus
Shri. Sumit Mulick, Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. V.G. Salgare, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. G.O. Wattamwar, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. V.M. Vibhute, Advocate for Respondent No. 4
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE: 7th SEPTEMBER, 2018
PER COURT
{2} 922CP345-18
survives in the Petition. The Petition is disposed of accordingly
as withdrawn.
( MANISH PITALE ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE JUDGE
mta
Randhir s/o Dinkarrao Deshmukh
Shri. Sumit Mulick
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
