Shri Rajendra Bhanudas Andhale v. Shri Tanaji Satre
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 28cp317
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5498 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. S. B. Deshmukh for petitioner. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & G. S. KULKARNI,JJ .
June 18, 2018.
P.C. :
Perused the record and the impugned order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation has been decided by the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Navi Mumbai.
In view of the above, Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
(G. S. KULKARNI , J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Petitioner
State
NARESH H. PATIL
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court