This court granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) in a notice of motion arising from an appeal in an arbitration petition. The order emphasized that this relief does not preclude the parties from referring the dispute to arbitration. The notice of motion was disposed of accordingly.
Interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6 nma 226-18=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 226 OF 2018 IN
APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2018
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 279 OF 2011
Bottero S.P.A.
… Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Bottero S.P.A. … Appellant V/s. Euro Glass Limited & Anr . … Respondents
Mr. Rohan Rajadhyaksha a/w Mr. Shahen Pradhan for the Applicant. Mr. Aditya Pimple a/w Ms. Sapna Rachure, Mr. Alok Mishra i/b T. M. Tripathi & Co. for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL &
G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 15th JUNE, 2018
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties. Perused the record.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) should be granted while disputing parties refer the matter to arbitration.
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
