Two contempt petitions were disposed of as the dispute was resolved. The court noted that demand drafts were handed over by the respondent along with possession keys, satisfying the earlier consent order.
Both Contempt Petitions No. 176 and 180 of 2015 were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.CP176& 180_2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 176 OF 2015
Vilas Ramchandra Satam ... Petitioner Vs. Rishi Chintan Mali & Anr. ... Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 180 OF 2015
Sanjay Ramchandra Satam ... Petitioner Vs. Rishi Chintan Mali & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Onkar Virendra Warange, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sukruta A. Chimalker i/b. Mr. Shekhar B. Prabhavalkar, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Mrs. M.R. Bhoir, Advocate for respondent No. 2/Corporation.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 20th February, 2018.
P.C.:
The learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submitted that pursuant to the order dated 12th February, 2018, respondent No. 1 has brought two Demand Drafts of Rs.44,000/- each in the names of Vilas Ramchandra Satam and Sanjay Ramchandra Satam. The learned counsel submitted that respondent No. 1 shall handover the keys of two premises to the petitioners tomorrow at 11.00 a.m. at the site.
1 / 2
4.CP176& 180_2015.doc
the petitioners along with the possession letter of permanent alternate premises in view of the consent order dated 25th October, 2013.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
Vilas Ramchandra Satam
Sanjay Ramchandra Satam
Rishi Chintan Mali
Mridula Bhartkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
