Single judge allowed the applicant to withdraw the Civil Application and dismissed it as withdrawn. No substantive order on merits was passed.
Permission to withdraw the Civil Application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.CAA40_2018.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 40 OF 2018 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 825 OF 2016
Gulorkh Ardeshiri Jamshed Tujbux … Applicant Vs.
Parvez Ardeshir Buzorg & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Tushar Bhavsar i/b. Neha Choksi, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Suneel D. Mogre, Advocate for respondent nos. 2(A)to 2(C), 4 and 5.
Mr. Yogesh Dabke, AGP for respondent no. 6. Mrs. M.R. Bhoir, Advocate for respondent nos. 8, 9 and 10.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 20th February, 2018.
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw this Civil Application.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
Gulorkh Ardeshiri Jamshed Tujbux
Parvez Ardeshir Buzorg & Ors.
Mr. Mukesh Chetnani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
