No orders. The court issued a placeholder conclusion for two company appeal proceedings without any substantive ruling or direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2014
Mr.sathyaprakash Subramanian And 2 Ors. ....Petitioner V/S
Mr.mohamad Rafiq Jaffarbhai Bagwan ....Respondent
WITH
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2015
Mohammed Rafiq Jafferbhai Bagwan ....Petitioner V/S Sathyaprakash Subramaniam ....Respondent
Mr. Arif Bookwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Aparajita Chandra I/b Amrita Saldanha for Appellants in COAPP/35/2014 and for Respondent in COAPP/62/2015.� Mr. Mohamad Rafiq Jaffarsh Bagwan- Respondent in COAPP/35/2014 and for Appellant in COAPP/62/2015 appeared in-person.
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM, J DATE : 8th October, 2018
P.C. :
No orders.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Mr.sathyaprakash Subramanian And 2 Ors.
Mr.mohamad Rafiq Jaffarbhai Bagwan
Mohammed Rafiq Jafferbhai Bagwan
Sathyaprakash Subramaniam
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
