Disposed
Rakesh G Jain v. M/S. Esque Finmark Private Limited and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/1410/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
905-CHS1410.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1410 OF 2018 IN
SUIT NO. 42 OF 2016
Rakesh G. Jain IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
….. Applicant
Rakesh G. Jain
….. Plaintiff
VERSUS
Esque Finmark Private Limited & Ors.
….. Defendants
Mr.J.P.Sen, Senior Advocate, a/w. Ms.Devanshi Sethi, i/b. Parinam Law Associates for the Applicant.
Mr.Rashmin Jain, i/b. Kanga & Co. for the Defendant nos. 1 and 6. Ishi Jain, i/b. Kiran Jain and Company for the Defendant nos. 2 and 5.
Ms.Nikita Panse, i/b. Veritas Legal for the Defendant nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2018
P.C .
By consent of parties, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). It is made clear that merely because the amendment as prayed is permitted by this court, none of the defendants have admitted any contents of the amendment. All issues on merits including the issue of limitation are kept open. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended copy of the plaint shall be served upon the defendants' advocates within two weeks from the date of carrying out amendment. No order as to costs.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
Rakesh G. Jain
Esque Finmark Private Limited
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court