Siddharth Shashikant Amrute and Anr. Vs Balaram D. Amrute and 2 Ors. - Caveator — Bombay HC (2018)

Learned counsel appearing for the applicants has been served with a copy of the chamber summons. There is delay of three days in filing the affidavit in support of the caveat. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the applicants, I have perused the averments made in paragraph 2 of the affidavit in support of the caveat. I am satisfied that the delay of three days in filing the affidavit in support of the caveat is satisfactorily explained in paragraph 2 of

1/2

912-cst16-18.doc

the affidavit in support of the caveat.

For the reasons recorded in the affidavit in support of the caveat, the delay of three days in filing the caveat is condoned.

terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

The Prothonotary & Senior Master is directed to convert the testamentary petition into testamentary suit.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

¶22

2/2

Siddharth Shashikant Amrute and Anr. v. Balaram D. Amrute and 2 Ors. - Caveator