The High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST against an order of the CESTAT, with both appeals subsequently withdrawn by the appellant citing a CBIC circular requiring withdrawal of appeals where tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-CEXA-153-155-2017.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signedby JitendraShankar NijasureDate: 2018.10.1117:51:12 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2017 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2017
The Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West … Appellant Versus M/s. Toyotta Lakozy Auto Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. Swapnil Bangur, for the Appellant.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 10TH OCTOBER, 2018
PC:-
1/2
7-CEXA-153-155-2017.DOC
of this he tenders two pursis both dated 5th October, 2018 filed by the Commissioner seeking to withdraw these Appeals in view of the CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018. The pursis are taken on record and marked 'A' for identification.
Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West
M/s. Toyotta Lakozy Auto Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court