The High Court disposed of an appeal under the Central Excise Act that the appellant sought to withdraw pursuant to a CBIC circular restricting appeals where tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-CEXA-185-2017.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasureDate: 2018.09.2611:09:24 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane – … Appellant II (Now Commissioner of CGST & C.Ex. Palghar Commissionerate) Versus M/s. Conwood Pre Fab Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent
Ms. P.S. Cardozo with Ms. Ruju Thakkar for the Appellant. Mr. Makrand Joshi, I/b MAX Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:-
challenges the order dated 4th November, 2015 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal).
1/2
13-CEXA-185-2017.DOC
of CGST & C.Ex., Palghar Commissionerate) seeks to withdraw this Appeal. In support of this she tenders a pursis dated 21st September, 2018 filed by the Commissioner seeking to withdraw the Appeal in view of the CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018. The pursis is taken on record and marked 'A' for identification.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane
M/s. Conwood Pre Fab Pvt. Ltd.
M.S.Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court