Dismissed
The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (Ltu) v. M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd.
Bombay HCCEXA/184/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-CEXA-184-2017.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Central Excise & … Appellant Service Tax (LTU) V/s. M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. Swapnil Bangur, with Ms. Maya Majumdar for the Appellant. Mr. Makrand Joshi, I/b MAX Legal for the Respondent.
| CORAM: | M.S.SANKLECHA & |
|---|---|
| RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. | |
| DATED: | 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2018. |
PC:-
i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasureDate: 2018.09.2611:09:23 +0530
the case and in law the Tribunal was correct in holding that the Respondent-Assessee is not entitled to file CENVAT Credit on account of maintenance and repair services provided to
1/2
12-CEXA-184-2017.DOC
windmills installed and situated away from the factory and factory premises?
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
12015 TIOL 1371.
2/2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad Vs. Endurance Technology Pvt. Ltd. 1Distinguished¶16
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (LTU)
M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court