Appellant withdrew the appeal citing a CBIC circular directing withdrawal of appeals where tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
49-CEXA-18-2017.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasure Date: 2018.09.0513:53:48 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur Commissionerate
… Appellant
Versus
M/s. Panam Engineers
…Respondent
Mr. M. Dwivedi, I/b Nikhil Wadikar for the Appellant.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:-
1/2
49-CEXA-18-2017.DOC
(Legal) CGST & CX, Belapur Commissionerate seeks to withdraw this Appeal. This is on account of tax effect being less of Rs.50,00,000/- as provided in CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
The Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur Commissionerate
M/s. Panam Engineers
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court