The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant on instructions due to the tax effect being less than Rs.50 lakhs following a CBIC directive dated 11 July 2018.
Precinct of appeal dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48-CEXA-16-2008.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasure Date: 2018.09.0513:53:46 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Central Excise - Belapur … Appellant Versus M/s. Apar Ltd., & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. P.S. Cardozo, I/b Joel Carlos for the Appellant. Mr. Hormaz Daaruwalla with Bhairavi Pathak I/b. Joshi & Co. for Respondents.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:-
1/2
48-CEXA-16-2008.DOC
seeks to withdraw this Appeal. This is on account of tax effect being less of Rs.50,00,000/- as provided in CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
Commissioner of Central Excise - Belapur
M/s. Apar Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court